Skip to main content

Atlantic Transmission Study

A study co-led by NREL evaluated coordinated solutions that would support energy transmission along the U.S. Atlantic Coast, addressing gaps in existing analyses.

Floating wind turbines in the ocean with a ship

The Atlantic Transmission Study (executive summary) identifies and compares different transmission strategies along the U.S. Atlantic Coast, from Maine through South Carolina. Ensuring adequate, affordable, and timely transmission access can support growing energy needs in some of the most populated locations in the United States.

The study evaluated multiple pathways for coordinated transmission solutions along the U.S. Atlantic Coast in the near term (by 2030) and long term (by 2050) under various combinations of electricity supply and demand while supporting grid reliability and resilience and ocean co-use.

The study fills gaps in prior analyses by providing a multiregional planning perspective that incorporates environmental, ocean co-use, and other siting considerations into defining potential offshore transmission routes. The study also compares different multiregional offshore transmission topologies and their associated costs and benefits. In addition, the team analyzed reliability impacts from a multiregional perspective.

The study helped inform the Atlantic Offshore Wind Transmission Action Plan. Researchers from NREL and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory conducted the study, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Wind Energy Technologies Office.

 

Atlantic Offshore Wind Transmission Study Intraregional, interregional, and backbone topologies

The intraregional, interregional, and backbone topologies investigated each representing different potential offshore networks. Illustrations by Billy Roberts, NREL

Project Objectives

The study was designed to:

  • Identify scenarios and pathways of transmission topologies (such as radial lines, backbones, or a meshed network), sequencing, and build-out in U.S. Atlantic waters from 2030 through 2050
  • Analyze impacts, such as economics, wind curtailment, and reliability, of multiple scenarios
  • Characterize and compare transmission technologies for the different scenarios, as well as cost and benefit trade-offs for high-voltage alternating current and direct current technologies
  • Evaluate operational, environmental, reliability, and resilience considerations of various transmission topologies
  • Collect data and develop models that are readily usable by the energy industry for conducting analyses and studies.

All activities closely engaged with and drew expertise from a technical review committee, which provided input throughout the project on assumptions, scenarios, and the modeling framework.

Key Findings

Key findings of the study suggest that offshore transmission networks:

  • Can be planned while considering ocean co-uses and environmental constraints
  • Can reduce curtailment and usage of higher-cost generators
  • Contribute to grid reliability by enabling resource adequacy and helping manage the unexpected loss of grid components (contingencies)
  • Offer benefits that outweigh the costs, often by a ratio of 2 to 1 or more (especially with interregional interlinks, which provide the highest value)
  • Can help reduce development risk when built in phases, but early implementation of high-voltage direct current technology standards is essential for future interoperability.

Frequently Asked Questions

More than one-third of the value of the interregional network could be at risk if technology standards are not developed for projects delivered in 2035. The hypothetical trajectory described in the Executive Summary shows that 4 of the 11 platforms included in the interregional topology are assumed to be built in 2035, and the value from interlinking those points of interconnection would be at risk.

No. We assumed that the export cables would be sized to accommodate needs, and any excess capacity could be used based on optimal usage of interlink and export cables.

There could be circumstances where onshore transmission upgrade requirements could be lower in interlinked topologies. However, as the assumed maximum injections are the same in all topologies we studied, we assumed the same upgrades.

Platforms that are close together, and are connected to different regions, will likely have the highest ratios of benefits to costs. The majority of costs are cable costs and interlinks that connect interregionally demonstrated the largest value. Note that this study uses illustrative points of interconnection, wind energy areas, and interlinks. We also did not study each interlink individually and cannot give direct guidance on which to build first.

No. Our choice to study 85 GW was motivated by modeling efforts, previous work, and discussions with stakeholders. However, economics, grid needs, and siting constraints on land could alter energy deployment decisions in the Atlantic by 2050.

Contacts

Greg Brinkman

Technical Lead

[email protected]

Lanaia Carveth

Project Manager

[email protected]


Share

Last Updated Sept. 29, 2025